Is on the Line,
Experience Matters
A DUI arrest is stressful enough when it begins with a traffic stop. When the case also involves an accident, the stakes can change quickly. A crash may affect the police investigation, the charges filed by the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office, the DMV consequences, the possible sentence, and the way the defense must be built.
Not every accident turns a DUI into a felony. Not every injury allegation is as serious as it first sounds. A person can be arrested after a minor collision, a single-car crash, a fender bender, or a serious injury accident, and each situation has to be evaluated on its own facts. The important questions are not only whether alcohol or drugs were involved, but also whether the prosecution can prove impairment, driving, causation, injury, and a violation of a legal duty.
The Law Office of Joshua R. Bourne represents clients facing DUI and criminal charges in San Diego County. Attorney Joshua R. Bourne has more than 20 years of criminal law experience handling misdemeanor and felony cases, including DUI matters. In accident-related DUI cases, early defense work can matter because the physical evidence, witness statements, medical records, and police conclusions may shape the entire case.
A standard DUI case is usually charged under California Vehicle Code section 23152. That statute covers driving under the influence of alcohol, driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or higher, driving under the influence of drugs, and related DUI theories.
When there is an accident, prosecutors look at more than chemical test results. They may ask how the crash happened, whether another person was hurt, whether the driver violated a traffic law, whether the driver left the scene, and whether the collision was caused by the alleged impairment or by something else. A crash can make the case feel more serious to police, prosecutors, the DMV, and the court, even before the evidence has been tested.
That does not mean the prosecution automatically has a stronger case. Accidents happen for many reasons, including unsafe conduct by another driver, road conditions, poor lighting, mechanical problems, sudden braking, or confusing intersections.
If no one other than the driver is injured, the case may still be filed as a misdemeanor DUI under Vehicle Code section 23152. A minor crash can still affect the tone of the case, but the accident alone does not necessarily create a felony.
For example, a driver may be accused of hitting a parked car, damaging a sign, sliding into a curb, or being involved in a low-speed collision with no reported injury. Prosecutors may still pursue DUI charges if they believe the evidence shows DUI. The accident may be used as evidence of unsafe driving, but it does not replace the required proof of DUI.
A defense lawyer may examine whether the officer had enough evidence to determine who was driving, when the driving occurred, and whether the test result reflects the driver’s condition at the time of driving.
Vehicle Code section 23153 is the main California statute used when a DUI allegedly causes bodily injury to someone other than the driver. It is not enough for the prosecution to show that the person drove under the influence and that an accident happened. The prosecution generally must prove that the driver, while violating one of the DUI provisions, also committed an unlawful act or neglected a legal duty while driving, and that act or neglect proximately caused bodily injury to another person.
This causation requirement matters. If another driver caused the crash, if the alleged injury was not caused by the collision, or if the injury evidence is weak, those facts may affect the charge. Section 23153 can be charged based on alcohol, drugs, a 0.08 percent or higher blood alcohol concentration, commercial driving, or certain passenger-for-hire situations.
DUI causing injury is commonly treated as a “wobbler,” meaning it can be filed as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the facts, the injuries, the person’s record, and the prosecutor’s assessment. A minor injury case may be handled differently from a case involving broken bones, hospitalization, multiple victims, or allegations of reckless driving.
The injury does not have to be catastrophic for prosecutors to consider Vehicle Code section 23153. Complaints of pain, soft tissue injuries, cuts, bruises, sprains, or medical treatment after the crash may be enough for the government to review the case as an injury DUI. However, the type and severity of the injury can affect filing decisions, negotiation, sentencing exposure, and whether enhancements are alleged.
The defense should not assume that every claimed injury is legally or factually established. Medical records may show preexisting conditions, delayed complaints, inconsistent symptoms, or uncertainty about causation. Police summaries are not the same as medical proof. Insurance claims are not the same as criminal causation. The prosecution still has to connect the alleged injury to the driving conduct that it claims violated the law.
An accident-related DUI can become a felony when someone other than the driver is injured and the case is filed under Vehicle Code section 23153. Felony exposure becomes more serious if the alleged injuries are substantial, if there are multiple injured people, if the accused has prior DUI convictions, or if the facts suggest grossly dangerous driving.
California Vehicle Code section 23554 addresses punishment for felony DUI causing injury under section 23153. Depending on the circumstances, a felony conviction can bring custody exposure, fines, DUI education requirements, probation terms, driver’s license consequences, and restitution.
A prior record can also change how the case is viewed. Prior DUI convictions within the lookback period, a prior felony DUI, or prior advisements about the dangers of impaired driving may affect charging and plea negotiations.
If a DUI accident causes serious harm, prosecutors may consider a great bodily injury enhancement under Penal Code section 12022.7. Great bodily injury generally means significant or substantial physical injury. It is more than minor or moderate harm, but the line between an ordinary injury and great bodily injury can be heavily disputed.
A great bodily injury allegation can dramatically increase the potential consequences of a felony DUI case. It can also affect whether the offense is treated as a serious felony and whether prison exposure increases. Because of that, the defense may focus closely on the medical evidence, the nature of the injury, the recovery, the mechanism of injury, and whether the accused personally caused the harm within the meaning of the enhancement statute.
If more than one person is injured or killed in a DUI-related incident, Vehicle Code section 23558 may become an issue. That statute provides for additional punishment in certain felony cases involving more than one injured victim. The defense may examine each person’s alleged injury separately because causation, severity, documentation, and credibility can differ from victim to victim.
If a DUI accident results in death, the case may move beyond DUI causing injury. California Penal Code section 191.5 addresses vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, including gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. These are extremely serious allegations that can carry major prison exposure.
In a fatal crash case, the prosecution may focus on impairment, the driving conduct, the cause of the collision, whether the conduct amounted to gross negligence, and whether the death was legally caused by the accused person’s driving. Accident reconstruction, toxicology, roadway evidence, event data, video, 911 calls, and witness statements may become central.
Some DUI accident cases also involve allegations that the driver left the scene. California Vehicle Code section 20001 applies to hit and run involving injury or death, while Vehicle Code section 20002 applies to hit and run involving property damage. These allegations can be charged separately from DUI.
Leaving the scene can make a DUI case more serious. Prosecutors may argue that flight shows consciousness of guilt, although there may be other explanations. A driver may have been confused, injured, unaware that a collision occurred, or trying to move to a safer location.
Hit and run allegations require careful review of the timeline. Where did the vehicle stop? What did the driver know? Was anyone visibly injured? Were police called? Did the driver return? These details can matter as much as the DUI evidence.
A DUI accident can also trigger DMV consequences. The DMV process is separate from the criminal court case. In many DUI arrests, there is a short deadline to request a DMV hearing to challenge an administrative suspension. The issues at that hearing may include whether the officer had reasonable cause, whether the arrest was lawful, and whether the chemical test evidence supports the suspension.
A court conviction can also trigger separate license consequences under Vehicle Code section 13352. In injury cases, the license consequences may be more serious than in a standard first-time DUI. Restricted license options may depend on the conviction, prior record, ignition interlock device requirements, proof of insurance, and DUI program enrollment.
An accident-related DUI case may involve restitution. In California criminal cases, a defendant can be ordered to pay victim restitution for economic losses caused by the offense. In a DUI accident, that can include medical bills, lost wages, property damage, and other documented losses.
Insurance issues may also arise. The other driver, passengers, pedestrians, or property owners may file civil claims. Statements to insurance adjusters can create risk because they may touch on fault, impairment, timing, drinking, drug use, injury, or causation. A person facing a DUI accident case should be careful about giving recorded statements or informal explanations without understanding how the criminal case may be affected.
After an arrest, it is natural to want to explain yourself. Be careful. Do not contact alleged victims to apologize, negotiate, or discuss what happened. Do not post about the crash on social media. Do not guess about your blood alcohol level, the cause of the accident, or whether someone was injured. Do not assume that an insurance conversation is harmless simply because it is not happening in court.
A DUI case involving an accident can move fast, and early decisions can affect both the criminal case and the DMV case. The prosecution may be looking at misdemeanor DUI, DUI causing injury, felony charges, enhancements, hit and run allegations, restitution, and license consequences. The right defense strategy depends on the facts, not on assumptions made at the crash scene.
The Law Office of Joshua R. Bourne represents clients in San Diego facing DUI charges, including cases involving accidents, injuries, DMV issues, and felony allegations. Attorney Joshua R. Bourne understands how prosecutors evaluate DUI cases and how important it is to challenge the evidence before early conclusions harden into the government’s theory of the case.
If there was an accident during your San Diego DUI case, contact The Law Office of Joshua R. Bourne to discuss the charges, the DMV issues, and the defense options available under California law.